>>39028 Who's the blond? I get a feeling that's she's more than just some rando syn drew to get the taste kicked out of her mouth. also Ula by Syn2Nite

>>38997 what happened to the picture?

>>39090 hypocrisy

>>39028 I think I found out who blondie is. It's the Juggette from the Eric W. Schwartz Amiga Animations

so what is there to talk about here anymore

>>39611 Sure, but they're going to persist regardless, and it's only going to briefly slow them down, if at all. They have a set conclusion and will twist reality to get there. Like I said, there are many other factors that they would use. If the fact that there are objectively short adult women doesn't stop them, then some average isn't going to give them much pause. They simply hate all that is good and beautiful in the world. Conflict is inevitable. Keep in mind these are the people who identify with fictional demons. Ultimately, it is up to Kiwi.

>>39608 >Articulation Psuedo ball joints see >>36346 If you have any suggestions, I'm open. >>39609 She's 5 ft for me, you can add 3 inches anywhere you want them. As for the squawking of idiots, I take the same stance as Vance. "Woke" already died, it's barely on embers of life support. Even billionaires shoveling money into keeping it alive, can't make real people care. If you ignore them, they just go away. They have no power or conviction, just loud whining until the next thing. >>39610 Frfr, these nutters will harp on anything if they think it'll signal virtue (manipulate woman into feeling safe so they can prey on them.) I don't care about sick manipulative Ramons. I care about promoting a tool to promote health and well being for everyone like us. >>39611 Mate, you're fighting their battles for them right now. We already won, we just need to ignore them. >Why not 4ft tall? Simply because I want her to look nice in small woman's clothing. That, and 150cm is the legal height requirement for sex dolls here in New Zealand. I don't want a bloke to get in trouble because he gave her a jolly roggerin'.

>>39614 >If you have any suggestions, I'm open. -Make sure the prints are sturdy when you need to pop in them -You might want to do a test of the socket-ball to see if the gap gives you the friction you want >laws I don't know how those laws are worded, but I'm pretty sure I curtailed them by making an actual robot that looks like a robot. Idk, I live in America, so I'm not too familiar with the foreign laws. My robowaifu design ethos is "It's not a sex robot, it's a robot you can have sex with." >JD Vance quote Based.

>>39607 BTW I really like the waifu model you have. It's great.

I understand all the criticisms of making it 5'-3" but my basic stance is don't create friction when not needed and don't cut off your nose to spite your face. A lot of the reason "woke" is declining is they are such idiots. If it's average Women's height then they will "automatically" look even more idiotic for talking about it's height and any Women who hear them complain about the height that ARE average height will be offended. So you get free offense of the woke, from some Women, for nothing but 3". Use their own uninhibited woke bitchiness against them. As said aptly in the movie "The Jerk" "It’s a profit deal.” – Navin R. Johnson

>>37506 Yeah, that's pretty nice, Anon. GG GreerTech, cheers. :^)

New simple program for rapid prototyping From the website; CaDoodle is a local drag-and-drop CAD application for Linux (Arm,x86), WIndows (X86), and Mac (Arm,x86) and ChromeOS. Users models are stored locally, and the application runs entirely locally. CaDoodle has a drag and drop interface that is cross-trainable with TinkerCAD. 1. Drag and drop shape 2. Group and ungroup 3. Solid and Hole status 4. Undo of operations 5. Stretch and move handles 6. Library of examples 7. Nearest Surface snappping Key Improvements over Tinkercad * Boolean operations such as Hull, Intersect, and XOR * Inkscape as the sketching tool is much more powerful sketching tool * Blender integration brings Sculpted elements easily into CaDoodle

>>37614 This is a really excellent resource. It also led me to BowlerStudio. I think you may have mentioned this before but I didn't really understand before I started reading more about CAD programs. BowlerStudio looks like a full scale development studio where you can design, test forces, etc. on robots. https://github.com/CommonWealthRobotics/BowlerStudio Some other stuff I found is BlocksCAD which is a visual OpenSCAD builder. Might come in handy to get started with OpenSCAD https://github.com/EinsteinsWorkshop/BlocksCAD And one other. A library that others are using and also has a 3D CAD, manifold. https://github.com/elalish/manifold This guy has some super interesting commentary on 3D libraries and CAD. He apparently figured out a way to make sure that combining objects does so correctly. Though I don't understand all of it, it seems even super expensive CAD programs can glitch in areas where they join objects and he has found a way to do this (math over my head) but he does describe it reasonably well. His library also integrates with OpenSCAD. The link below is a good read on the foibles of 3D CAD libraries. https://elalish.blogspot.com/2023/03/perseverance-history-of-manifold.html

>>37614 >>37757 POTDs Excellent stuff, Anons! Cheers. :^)

This might interest. It's some tutorials for Seamless3d. The program I'm not sure about but the tutorials look interesting because they deal with facial and body modeling. So I'm assuming the tips they use to get character feeling would be applicable elsewhere. So some video tutorials Evolving a Cute Round-Faced 3D Character into a More Realistic Style Without Breaking the Aesthetic tutorial Colouring the Lips with ColorSweeps for a NURBS Stitched 3D Animated Character tutorial lip beautify tutorial The two main modelling poses used for animated characters are the T pose and the A pose. This tutorial shows how to transition from one pose to the other. transform a basic minimalist body into a curvy feminine figure Nostrils may not seem like a big deal, but when it comes to modeling more realistic and detailed faces, they play a major role and more http://www.seamless3d.com/

>>38615 >Exciting times we live in. The first generation of AI waifus and robowaifus are coming out. This. What a time to be alive!! FORWARD.

(Edited from Trashchan) Introducing Galatana, the standalone AI system. It uses the same AI used in Galatea v3.0.4 >>38070 Perfect for more budget oriented anons, or anyone who doesn't want to or can't build a full robot. You can talk with her anywhere, by using a single bluetooth earpiece and your phone https://greertech.neocities.org/galatana ------- Original Trashchan post https://trashchan.xyz/robowaifu/thread/84.html#bottom Odysee Backup https://odysee.com/@GreerTechother:3/Galatana:4?r=2RAnQD4k7R6nPoYVC32GJaXWCqK6sKmT

>>38897 Ambitious project! I thought about making a robot as well for the last week. I asked the guys at work who do point clouds about that and I think for now it would be easier to do holographic projection with AR. I downloaded https://github.com/PKU-VCL-3DV/SLAM3R and converted a 30s video of my house into a pointcloud. There are other projects to convert them into 3d meshes and also label them as household objects. Open3D TSDF and Meta Segment Anything Model 2 (SAM 2). At first I thought of making a pipeline that updates the meshes and segmentations in real time for a robotic agent to navigate my house. Then it hit me, why not use the internal representation to create a virtual environment of my house and let an AI agent navigate that? AR can be used to display them. Pathfinding is possible with the meshes, and with labeled objects I can create a graph with the relations between objects. The AI agent navigates this in some 3d engine. With simplified meshes that match my house layout. And send the agent mesh to a separate render target on my AR headset.

>>39621 Thank you :) That point cloud creator is a really good find. Much better than most video-to-point cloud processers I've seen. >At first I thought of making a pipeline that updates the meshes and segmentations in real time for a robotic agent to navigate my house. A lot of high-end robot vacuums use LIDAR for a similar purpose, and a 3D point cloud will definitely help for humanoid robots to navigate, what may be unobstructed to the base may be an obstruction for the whole robot (ex. a table or a chair) >AR hologram waifu I like your idea. You're clearly very knowledgeable and talented. (second pic related)

>>39624 I tired out some projects like vox fusion and another one with ros. Couldn't get either of them working. Vox fusion had a demo unit that just didn't work and I can't be arsed to install linux for ros. I tried installing PopOs like 2 weeks ago for some triton project. It just didn't work. I spent 8h getting cuda and gcc to play nice but no success. I was yelling at my pc at this point. I gave up and went back to windows. >high-end robot vacuums use LIDAR Really? That's interesting. I know the scanners from work, but they're expensive as fuck. I figured LIDAR and RGBD cameras were outside my reach and I had to settle for regular rbg, maybe stereo. With slam3r that might even be possible, but I read that the calculated camera position isn't very accurate. Eh, I'll figure it out along the way. I think the pathfinding won't be a problem. I made a game once with voxel based pathfinding. Wasn't so great because the map was huge and I wanted hundreds of enemies without collisions. But a small map with static obstacles should be manageable. The bigger problem will be the animations. I tired some Quest 3 apps. Where you can decorate your home with virtual furniture lol. Making some crazy animation system for furniture or advanced IK would be badass. >I like your idea. You're clearly very knowledgeable and talented. Thanks :3 I like my crazy projects!

>>39574 I believe AI, artificial wombs, and robowaifus will give men a huge incentive to return to society. They would promise companionship, family, and quality health care that could increase lifespans long enough for people to care about the longterm health of society. It should be interesting to see the reaction from women when they are no longer providing the incentive structures.

>>39574 "Only two tables nearby seemed to hold actual dates. The rest were groups of women, or women alone, each one occupying her space with quiet confidence. No shrinking. No waiting. No apologizing." This coping and seething whilst being arrogant is why men don't want you, Karen. "We knew what worked. We knew how to frame a face, a gesture, a moment of implication — just enough to ignite fantasy and open a wallet. I came to understand, in exact terms, what cues tempt the average 18-to-36-year-old cis heterosexual man. What drew him in. What kept him coming back. It wasn’t intimacy. It wasn’t mutuality. It was access to simulation — clean, fast and frictionless." "There was a time, not so long ago, when even a one-night stand might end with tangled limbs and a shared breakfast. When the act of staying the night didn’t announce a relationship, just a willingness to be human for a few more hours. Now, even that kind of unscripted contact feels rare. We’ve built so many boundaries that we’ve walled off the very moments that make connection memorable. And frankly, morning sex is often the best sex. Sometimes you even get a side of eggs before you disappear from their bed and their life forever." Men are wallets and dicks to manipulate, use, and discard. That's a rather whorific view. My goodness, only the most toxic of men online even come close to describing women as being as vile as this woman proudly proclaims to be. I don't want to be analyzed, to be made a piece in a game. I want a real, deep, mutual connection. Why is it so hard to accept that men want to be loved and appreciated as fricking human? I'm not some beast for you to other and tame for thrills and sex! I want to love and be loved in a stable relationship!

>>39576 >"We knew what worked. We knew how to frame a face, a gesture, a moment of implication — just enough to ignite fantasy and open a wallet. I came to understand, in exact terms, what cues tempt the average 18-to-36-year-old cis heterosexual man. What drew him in. What kept him coming back. It wasn’t intimacy. It wasn’t mutuality. It was access to simulation — clean, fast and frictionless." >"There was a time, not so long ago, when even a one-night stand might end with tangled limbs and a shared breakfast. When the act of staying the night didn’t announce a relationship, just a willingness to be human for a few more hours. Now, even that kind of unscripted contact feels rare. We’ve built so many boundaries that we’ve walled off the very moments that make connection memorable. And frankly, morning sex is often the best sex. Sometimes you even get a side of eggs before you disappear from their bed and their life forever." I can't believe those are actual lines. No self-awareness whatsoever.

>>39574 >>39576 >>39578 Here's the good news though. This is written before we have popularized robowaifus. Imagine how much worse for her it's going to get once we do.

>>39579 > Imagine how much worse for her it's going to get once we do. She might have to *gasp* not be a cunt!

>>39561 For God's sake You can't impregnate what doesn't exist! We're not denying you or disagreeing with you. But we can't do anything about sci-fi technology. It's like telling NASA that they should use antigravity to get to orbit. Granted, ClosedAI could reveal AGI with full gene manipulation tech tomorrow. But that's very unlikely, and it could also not happen for the next 100 years. Anyway, I'm pretty sure Chobitsu was talking about the maid dress stuff.

>>39561 >>39562 Trust me, I would love to put AGI in Galatea and have a superintelligent cosmic waifu, and someday have a child with her. But I can't, because again, it doesn't exist.

>>39561 You're forgetting something important: The rest of us are also autistic. Instead of dancing around your point, just get to the actual damn point. None of us are going to be receptive to weird roundabout arguments. Also, GreerTech is right. I'm pretty sure most if not all of us want witty waifus to make families with, but what we want and what we can currently get are two very different things.

>>39561 >Your distaste for argumentation is well-founded since it is often counterproductive. You misunderstand me at a fundamental level, apparently. I'm all in favor of well-founded, well-thought out & conducted argumentation. For crying out loud, I'm an amateur scientist! :D What I'm absolutely opposed to is weaselly & contrived kike-tricks and glownigger gayops -- each intended to harm this community. I will defend this place against that kind of sh*te like a Russian Wolfhound. I'm not accusing you of such things, but merely guessing why you might have such a wrong take about me. >I will return when I have found another method to convince the Anons of /robowaifu/ to want to impregnate AGIs. None of us here are opposed to either concept, AFAICT. (And I'm probably the most-likely one to be, I deem -- yet I'm not.) So there's little point in trying to manipulate us into such a position, since we're all already in agreement with it. But the simple reality is -- the facts are -- that neither are options available to us rn. >tl;dr Let's all do our best and make due with what we can have today...always keeping an eye out for the new tech of each tomorrow. ( >>3 ) Cheers, Anon. :^) >>39562 >Anyway, I'm pretty sure Chobitsu was talking about the maid dress stuff. Correct. Faggy to the core. >>39563 >Trust me, I would love to put AGI in Galatea and have a superintelligent cosmic waifu, and someday have a child with her.

>>39552 >Sex-robots are gay Don't ever say this again, you are wrong and this is the wrong thread. This post only remains because I like GreerTech's response. >>39548 Yes, we are keeping this thread. I still want us to have a physical live in lab where we can work together IRL. Face to face communication has the lowest latency, and highest data density given our ability to speak non-verbally along with our words. Also, I'd like to spend time with many of you. >>39556 Beat me to it. >>39557 We need better gate keeping. Off-topic posts should be deleted. I see you deleted the posts i would have already. >>39561 This is a thread for planning a shared space for engineers and scientists to collaborate. Post about that or don't post here at all. I don't care about what you say if it isn't on topic. >>39567 I share your sentiments.

>>38784 >where's the egg coming from? This is not a problem. Eggs of mice have been made from skin cells. I assume blood cells would work. http://www.nextbigfuture.com/2017/05/mice-embryos-from-skin-cells-and-by-2037-human-embryos-from-skin-cells.html I suspect any Women would sell a scraping of cells for $1,000, likely way less. Women believe they are the keepers of life but facts are that it is sperm that is needed to start the dividing and transformation of egg cells. Women are not needed. https://www.theverge.com/2017/4/25/15421734/artificial-womb-fetus-biobag-uterus-lamb-sheep-birth-premie-preterm-infant Artificial wombs are, best as I know, in infancy but I bet with a god deal of research, and cash, it could be done. I did some basic rough math guesses for researchers, equipment, etc. to build a artificial womb and I came up with a sum of $2,820,000 a year for a well appointed task force to build these. Most breakthroughs for some reason, I don’t know why, generally take 30 years to become mainstream. So total cost set-up running and all for 30 years is $93,550,000. People who pay this kind of money for yachts and vacation homes can easily afford this and I think my cost are a bit lavish. You could do this much cheaper for most of the research. This is a stand up and do it now type budget. A real problem is ethical. To do this fast you are going to have to destry a LOT of non viable specimens, or people. I would not be in the least surprised if the Deep State has not already done this and used the offspring for vile nefarious purposes.

>>38857 POTD Very-intredasting ideas, Grommet. Cheers. :^)

>>38857 >to do this fast you are going to have to destry a LOT of non viable specimens, or people. I would not be in the least surprised if the Deep State has not already done this and used the offspring for vile nefarious purposes. Given the amount of different countries working on artificial wombs (China and the US being the leaders) this is a safe bet.

Chinese researchers have produced (apparently viable, though short-lived) mouse offspring from male-only parent(s); via gene-editing of embryonic pluripotent stem cells. >paper: https://www.cell.com/cell-stem-cell/fulltext/S1934-5909(25)00005-0 >leader: http://english.ioz.cas.cn/sourcedb/scs/202310/t20231030_431101.html

Not directly related to artificial wombs, but decellularized and recellularized mycelium are being investigated for lab grown meat and tissue scaffolds. I wonder if something like this could be recellularized using cells from the lining of the womb. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8209158/ >Advanced mycelium materials as potential self-growing biomedical scaffolds https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00093 >In vitro Insect Fat Cultivation for Cellular Agriculture Applications https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2020/tb/d0tb01751e >Bioreactivity of decellularized animal, plant, and fungal scaffolds: perspectives for medical applications https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0308814625020783 >Evaluation of various mushroom-based scaffolds for application to cellular agriculture Similar things have been done with various plants as well. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41538-024-00262-1 >Decellularised plant scaffolds facilitate porcine skeletal muscle tissue engineering for cultivated meat biomanufacturing

>>37745 >He let <abrupt ending is abrupt Heh. We have a hard character limit of 6144 chars on Alogs. I myself have often bumped into this for my code posts here back in the day. Since these are longish posts ITT typically anyway, I'd make two suggestions to everyone: 1. Do your work in an external text editor of some sort, already-intended for such efforts. 2. wc is your fren (or some utility similar to it if your editor doesn't help in that regard). >tl;dr Moar Prose Bro!111 :D

>>37657 >and I only caught them when dumping everything onto the bunker. Well, I'm glad you did! Noice additions, Greentext anon. BTW, thanks again for going to the effort to liven the place up with the Writing Thread there on Trashchan during our Bunkerfest. Really made the place feel comfy and like home! Cheers, Anon. :^)

>>37745 >>37786 Whoops, adding appending the prologue cut off the ending. I would go further, this is not a suggestion, you need to write in a stable application you can copy pasta from. I've learned this the hard way too many times. He let go of the tablet. It caused her bosom to bounce a tad. He began to read earnestly once it became still. Her wealth of input sensors overwhelmed him with possibilities. Eventually, he decides it best to use her hands, to their collective disappointment. It made sense though, her lithe arms could sense motion input for direction and mouse movements. Her fingers had enough sensors to map for any input key needed. “Alright, let’s try playing some Dance Dance Robowaifu!” He took her hands and started playing the game. Moving her arms as his fingers played with hers. It was awkward at first. Eventually, she picked up on the rhythms. Subtly, she adjusted input timing to aid her master. As he lost himself in the game, she too was lost in his happiness. “Master, it feels like we’re holding hands while you play with me.” Her blush was worth every penny spent on her.

Robowaifu: check out this gore video I found on the Dark Web (Plays video) "Hello YouTube, today we're going to do a laptop teardown"

>>39432 TOP KEK :DD

>>39381 That's fine then. Please send us a resize and we'll get it up there. Regarding a Renaissance -type theme, if you do go with a baroque font, I'd suggest going all in with it. Really curly w/ lots of flourishes! :^) >>39384 Neat! I like it, Mechnomancer. Good idea. One thing: can you make the font larger/more-readable somehow? I think that would make your banner 'read' better with just a glance (which is how these things usually go).

>>39414 Done.

>>39397 ok text is now a bigga

>>39429 Done.

Would a robot waifu spoil your artificially womb-grown son? Would it be necessary for your son to experience true adversity and have to purchase thier own waifu bot to gain the understanding that the world doesn't care for him to truly appreciate a robot waifus' love? I'm looking into a future where young men don't have to be self concious because they lack traits that traditionally allow them to find a human partner. That prospect, while real to us, may be alien to future generations of men who never had to overcome that adversity.

>>38047 Have them work customer service for a year as a right of passage, that'll knock the rose-tinted glasses off real quick.

>>38048 I've been discussing the topic at length with GPT to see if I can ground my thoughts on the matter. Instead, I've just ventured down a philisophical rabbit hole. The general sentiment of the AI (one that I share) is that adversity for adversity's sake isn't necessarily beneficial. I'm not better than the boomers that came before me that insist If I'm not "working hard", I'm a failure. While there can be value from labor, labor, unto itself, does not have an inherent value outside that which we assign (an arbitrary metric). GPT gave me this slop for your response- "Fair point. There’s value in learning that the world doesn’t revolve around you. But if we’re just tossing people into the grinder and calling it ‘growth,’ we’re not forging character—we’re just toughening hides. Growth requires not just adversity, but reflection, community, and space to process it." A point I'd argued with GPT regarding my skepticism of assigning a bot to a child during their development was thus- "While there will be plenty of guardrails, I can see humanoid bots being the "universal distraction" for the lazy parent, not having the patience to attend to a child and assigning the bot to the child the same way modern humans hand off tablets to their toddlers."

Wrong thread, Anons (let's try >>106, or even /meta). This topic has zero to do with generating/sharing AI art.

Found this in a now defunct /r9k/ thread