>>41407
>Would you mind your wife being the techno-town bicycle?
I don't think anyone would be up for that. Outside of brothels with sex dolls in them over in Belgium or wherever, I guess? That being the case, I'd argue robowhorehouse =/= robowaifu.
If we're talking about a handmedown, that'd be a bit different. Like a maidbot that "serviced" all the men of the family line once they came of age. If there's some sentimentality tied to the bot, I don't think destroying it after you die is the best choice. This leads to the operative question.
>Is it purely a sexbot or a domestic care bot?
If the utility the bot can offer makes it more than cumdump than handing it down to your heirs or off to a good friend, it would be less like sharing a fleshlight, and more like sharing a computer or other tool
As for the "gross" factor, parts can be swapped out. You can get into a Ship of Theseus situation with your own waifu in that respect. Monogamy is a human thing; I don't think it should necessarily be forced onto bots. Of course, they'd be your property, so you can destroy them whenever you wish.
>>41424
I believe Greer has a certain degree of sentimentality for the issue. It's not any robot waifu he's handing down to his progeny, it's HIS robot waifu. The thought of that bot loving another (even if it's his own family) may evoke the cuck/ntr phobia, even if he's no longer alive to be cucked. Conversely, in the future, if you can have digital immortality, I can understand taking your Waifu's AI with you and maybe handing her body off to the next generation while you go to digital heaven.
I don't believe the physical consciousness can make that transfer, though. My digital doppleganger has already won that coin toss and doesn't even know it yet, the lucky fuck. Maybe we can achieve biological immortality, and you can love your waifu until the sun burns out. I'll sing a different tune in that case, but if the current reality is any indication, I don't think we'll get any kind of immortality.