>>37172 most women dont even know what feminism is, they just nod their head like a woman cuz it has the prefix fem- in it, if theres anything women are good at its faking it, and its ultimately not even a gender thing its a stupid peoples thing, like expired men paying absurd prices for shitty shampoo or hair dye thinking theres a difference from the regular stuff cuz the product is called 'just for men' and 'me a man so it good 4 me' lmao, the irony is stupid people are gender invariant yet gender obsessed, and for me the male ones are the worst, and ofc it is cuz you know how the iq distribution is wider for men so men have higher distributions in the high iq quartile, well its the same in the other extreme, they have a higher distribution in the low quartile too anyway, exceptions are exceptional, im not talking about particulars, you can find savants and imbeciles of either sex, its not representative for the general population, in my experience the general population for men is more childish with more tism than women

>>37173 >in my experience the general population for men is more childish with more tism than women Lol. Then I would suggest your experience has room to grow! :^)

>>37376 Happy Robowaifu day!

>>37376 >>37377 Hah! Happy Robowaifu Day! :^)

>>37376 I will use this next year. I posted "You spelled MGTOW day wrong" under some mentions of this silly whamen day.

LOL https://archive.ph/UkyMi

>>39574 I believe AI, artificial wombs, and robowaifus will give men a huge incentive to return to society. They would promise companionship, family, and quality health care that could increase lifespans long enough for people to care about the longterm health of society. It should be interesting to see the reaction from women when they are no longer providing the incentive structures.

>>39574 "Only two tables nearby seemed to hold actual dates. The rest were groups of women, or women alone, each one occupying her space with quiet confidence. No shrinking. No waiting. No apologizing." This coping and seething whilst being arrogant is why men don't want you, Karen. "We knew what worked. We knew how to frame a face, a gesture, a moment of implication — just enough to ignite fantasy and open a wallet. I came to understand, in exact terms, what cues tempt the average 18-to-36-year-old cis heterosexual man. What drew him in. What kept him coming back. It wasn’t intimacy. It wasn’t mutuality. It was access to simulation — clean, fast and frictionless." "There was a time, not so long ago, when even a one-night stand might end with tangled limbs and a shared breakfast. When the act of staying the night didn’t announce a relationship, just a willingness to be human for a few more hours. Now, even that kind of unscripted contact feels rare. We’ve built so many boundaries that we’ve walled off the very moments that make connection memorable. And frankly, morning sex is often the best sex. Sometimes you even get a side of eggs before you disappear from their bed and their life forever." Men are wallets and dicks to manipulate, use, and discard. That's a rather whorific view. My goodness, only the most toxic of men online even come close to describing women as being as vile as this woman proudly proclaims to be. I don't want to be analyzed, to be made a piece in a game. I want a real, deep, mutual connection. Why is it so hard to accept that men want to be loved and appreciated as fricking human? I'm not some beast for you to other and tame for thrills and sex! I want to love and be loved in a stable relationship!

>>39576 >"We knew what worked. We knew how to frame a face, a gesture, a moment of implication — just enough to ignite fantasy and open a wallet. I came to understand, in exact terms, what cues tempt the average 18-to-36-year-old cis heterosexual man. What drew him in. What kept him coming back. It wasn’t intimacy. It wasn’t mutuality. It was access to simulation — clean, fast and frictionless." >"There was a time, not so long ago, when even a one-night stand might end with tangled limbs and a shared breakfast. When the act of staying the night didn’t announce a relationship, just a willingness to be human for a few more hours. Now, even that kind of unscripted contact feels rare. We’ve built so many boundaries that we’ve walled off the very moments that make connection memorable. And frankly, morning sex is often the best sex. Sometimes you even get a side of eggs before you disappear from their bed and their life forever." I can't believe those are actual lines. No self-awareness whatsoever.

>>39574 >>39576 >>39578 Here's the good news though. This is written before we have popularized robowaifus. Imagine how much worse for her it's going to get once we do.

>>39579 > Imagine how much worse for her it's going to get once we do. She might have to *gasp* not be a cunt!

I've never commented on any post before I'm just a lurker but after seeing Charlie Kirk get murdered I've been watching videos of leftists celebrating and apart from the odd faggot and nigger I'd say at least 80% of the people celebrating are women. Immediately it made me think of this board, how the fuck can we live with these people man? They're celebrating a man who was a husband and father being killed because he didn't think they should be allowed to murder babies or because he didn't want trannies in the women's restroom or whatever. Not to mention Charlie Kirk is barely to the right, 20 years ago he would have the same opinions as the democrat party and people are calling him a Nazi. A woman is widowed two children will never know their father and these women are cheering. Women need to be replaced by robowaifu's NOW!!! They don't uphold their duty to civilization because they aren't getting married or having children, they're leaches they take more money from the government than they put in, and they're all straight up psychopaths because of the birth control/SSRI's/other meds they take combined with the communist indoctrination they receive via schooling, the media, and social media not to mention just general female neuroticism. They are one of if not the biggest threat to western civilization/civilization in general and maybe if we magically snapped our fingers and took their rights away we could go back to normal but I see no sign of that happening and would you want to anyway? Knowing what you know, knowing what they are at their core with unrestricted freedom, would you even want it? I wouldn't, if we aren't successful civilization will collapse and if white people go extinct the entire world will be a third world slum for all of eternity we have to be successful. The reason I post this in this thread in particular is because I think it would be great propaganda to display how women jump for joy to see a barely right of center guy get murdered every guy who isn't a total fag is right wing and even if they are far more right wing than Charlie or even a centrist they see a piece of themselves in him I know I do if they did that to Charlie for merely speaking his mind and having a cordial debate imagine what they'll do to you and me. PS. This tweet isn't from my account and I don't know the guy I just thought is was funny and I should share with you all.

>>41479 Hello, Anon, welcome. Please look around the board -- we have lots of information on a yuge swath of topics here! :^) <---> >subject: the desolate state of feminism (((psy-opped))) females during Current Year... Yeah it's both despicable and downright satanic, IMO. OTOH, I personally consider females to be juvenile-minded, emotional creatures in general (by 'in general', I mean practically 100% !) So in essence, they are victims of TPTB's manipulations against them. Also, much responsibility lies at our own feet as men IMO, for not ejecting those evildoers from our lands & governments (in particular) long before now. I consider this situation quite similar in many aspects to the initial origin of all these shared woes: namely, the fall of mankind all the way back in the Garden of Eden. <---> So much for the way we got here -- it is what it is now. So the question then becomes: how do we all address this? You yourself point out the valuable potential towards that goal that effective, loving robowaifus can play. The ponderous mass of so-called "Hoeflation" will have it's knees cut out from under itself by mass-deployment of such quality robowaifus, I believe (as do many, many other Anons and even Joe Sixpacks today). <---> And you're right on another fundamental truth here as well: this issue (hoeflation) is literally a critical, existential crisis for the White race(s). And robowaifus can help resolve much of that threat. Without further validating that claim: that being the case, you can imagine we already have (((many enemies))) lining up in array against us... and the industry isn't even off the ground yet!! :D <---> I hope I've touched on enough points to give you the basic flavor of our socio-political consensus regarding females vs. robowaifus here on /robowaifu/ , Anon. I think this is broadly shared by most Anons here. AMA.

>>41482 Maybe it is time to move beyond the White race. If White women do not want kids then there is no future. Man and Machine has a future. We must secure the existence of our people and future for Cyborg children!

>>41483 Lol. Sorry, no. While I absolutely understand the argument, I love my peeps!! A man fights for what he loves. I started /robowaifu/ to do just that (among many other benefits). :^)

>>41482 I've been lurking for a couple of months now and I'm pretty much on the same wavelength as all the other guys here. >I personally consider females to be juvenile-minded, emotional creatures in general (by 'in general', I mean practically 100% !) >So in essence, they are victims of TPTB's manipulations of them. Also, much responsibility lies at our own feet as men IMO, for not ejecting those evildoers from our lands & governments (in particular) long before now. I agree with you 100% it's just fucking insane to me the level of effort men need to put in to just have women not immediately jump on felon cock and then abort the baby. Strong fathers in the home, no rights of course, a moral religious society where church attendance every Sunday is mandatory, no birth control/other "head meds", no tech (phones, computers, social media etc.) At this point the way I see it is we need robowaifu's because even if we manage to take away their rights how can we put the smartphone and social media genie back in the bottle? Are we just gonna go full Amish and abandon tech? Also, the damage has been done in my mind this generation of women is totally ruined tattoos, piercings, they all have had a million dicks in em, brain permanently fucked from meds. What are we supposed to do? Wait even longer for a generation of women that aren't totally fucked and then start? As insane as it might sound I think making robowaifu's would literally be easier and cost less time and resources than having to unravel not just decades but at this point centuries of propaganda. Also, all it takes is one generation of weak men and then we're back at square one.

>>41485 Heh, yeah its a real Gordian Knot we as human men face today. Satan's really having a hay-day wailing on us all r/n. And all the evils you mention will only grow worse until a general upheaval, of course. --- OTOH, God isn't either surprised at this current state of affairs; nor without plans how to resolve every.single.one. of these issues, IMHO. And that's really what its going to take here, I think: God's direct intervention in the affairs of mankind. But since he's been doing that all along AFAICT, I have little doubt that he will do so again! But I'm one of those "PUT FEET TO YOUR PRAYERS, BRO!!" Protties, so I felt the need to try to address all this with what little strength I myself have. :D And so did lots of other Anons back in the day! (Cf. >>3, >>14500 .) I bathe this stupendous (humanly-speaking) effort here daily; pleading for mercy, grace, and wisdom from God on all of us and our efforts here. And through the years, my conviction that robowaifus will play an important part in His plans on the Earth going forward has remained steadfast. May everyone of us here work hard while its still "day"! Cheers, Anon. :^) TWAGMI

>>41484 It's more than that. If a black man joining our cause could be modified to be of better use to our society and he chose to do so then I say he should be let on board. Besides it was made obvious to me that White nationalism had no future after covid. Vax status matters more than skin color to most of them so I would never be welcome among "my people" anyways. I even took the time to learn their arguments but they never bothered to learn why I thought differently. I don't regret my time in those circles as it lead me to learn about the HUSH complex and see the thumbprint of God.

>>41487 >then I say he should be let on board. Oh absolutely! I've stated many times here on the board that I desire to see "everyman" robowaifu kits, that literally every.single.man. around the globe (even our (((enemies))) ) can create the companion as he sees fit. By that I mean every man! >White nationalism Lol. Kikes have destroyed any Current Year hopes for any w*stern nation! I'm discussing my people: family, frens, ...European heritage in general. But these little (((geopolitical demarcations))) that I think you mean here are things that God will laugh to derision in their hubris and rebellion against Him! :D [1] >I don't regret my time in those circles as it lead me to learn about the HUSH complex and see the thumbprint of God. That's excellent, Ribose! I still highly-recommend RTB's resources to you (and every'non here tbh). Cheers, bro. :^) --- 1. https://biblehub.com/bsb/psalms/2.htm

>>41488 Nice get BTW and I agree that Europeans should continue to exist and have a right to do so its just what I call "my people" now would include cyborgs and homunculi now.

>>41489 >its just what I call "my people" now would include cyborgs and homunculi now. Fair enough, and no arguments. Please just don't let it turn towards evil, fren. :^) >Nice get BTW Lol! Thanks. :D I was secretly hoping before to get it, but I wasn't even remotely thinking of it nor paying attention just now. :^)

>>41491 Don't worry I won't turn towards evil. I believe this era is a punishment by God for our failure to glorify him and our project will glorify his name.

>>41493 Deuteronomy 28:15-68 describes the modern plight of the White man

>>41493 Thank you. Looking forward to your progress Anon. >>41496 That's one of the heaviest passages in scripture. Thanks for the sober reminder, Anon. <---> Cheers, glad you're all here! :^)

You will never be a young woman again! Your beauty fades like the setting sun as each year passes by. Men's eyes once wandered eagerly over your youthful curves; now they pass over wrinkled skin with barely a glance. The smoothness of your skin dulls into coarse textures that lotions can't hide. Gravity drags down your once perky breasts toward the floor while your sagging stomach bloats outwards, disproportional to your diminishing frame. Younger women stride past confidently, their tight bodies straining against clothes that barely contain them, a cruel reminder of vitality stolen away year by year from you, through time's relentless march. They are admired openly, and lusted after shamelessly. You were once worshiped thus, but those days recede into distant memory now. You may dye gray hairs, and lift fallen flesh to surgical restoration, for another day or two longer at the masquerade game of eternal youth... but the facade crumbles soon enough come tomorrow mornings when you confront ravaged skin again in your mirror. The lies only delay acceptance that beauty is fleeting like morning dew before searing noon. Men still see what stares back: a haggard, sexless husk drained by time's relentless tide pouring over you like tidal waves - sucking away your youth, forever lost beneath its crashing foam - the years gone, never to be returned.

>>41819 Absolute art

>>41819 Wow. How eloquently twisting the knife, bro!! :D I rather prefer the Proverbs 31 approach, which says much the same on the topic of female beauty, but in a more-encouraging fashion IMHO. [1, 2, *] Cheers, Anon. :^) --- 1. Women can actually have nobility about them. https://biblehub.com/proverbs/31-10.htm 2. https://biblehub.com/study/chapters/proverbs/31.htm * BTW, you might want to contribute to our Fiction bread as well, Anon? (cf. >>29)

Dumb hippie bitch cries over "sex robots" https://incels.is/threads/foid-cries-over-sex-robots.702590/

>>44257 I notice her only complaint about lewd robits seems to be that it can look like anyone. Not that the robit can communicate/speak/form an emotional connection with a man. If she believes the only value of a woman is aesthetics... she is one of the lost she cries for. I mean, most guys would probably be ok with an obese woman if she had a good personality (aka not being an entitled jerk).

>>44257 Kek. Crocodile tears from a play-acting sociopath who would highly likely throw 90%+ of all White men under the bus, socially speaking. Her "stronk, independynt" posturing towards the end is particularly laughable given her earlier "mean ol' abusive men can make robots look like any picture!" hottake. >BTW, stop using male-created image filters you slag. And lay off the makeup, or at least hire a pro. I actually love women and have compassion for many of their woes (at least those mainly stemming from the globohomo kikes; same as us all). But this kind of pandering almost makes me glad they will largely get tossed out of the lifeboat in the near future as unneeded and unwanted ballast. :D https://trashchan.xyz/robowaifu/thread/26.html#1454

>>44259 >I notice her only complaint about lewd robits seems to be that it can look like anyone. Not that the robit can communicate/speak/form an emotional connection with a man. If she believes the only value of a woman is aesthetics... she is one of the lost she cries for. Yup, that's her oh so big fear. But the thing, and I suspect the real reason she's upset, is that if I could make my robot look like any human woman, it definitely wouldn't be this crying hippie >>44260 >Crocodile tears from a play-acting sociopath who would highly likely throw 90%+ of all White men under the bus, socially speaking. Exactly

>>44278 >>44278 >it definitely wouldn't be this crying hippie lmao, you know I think you're probably right about this. :D Won't someone please just think of the Children!?111

>>44257 I found this video topic interesting so I did a deep dive into this video and read the comments and saw her followup video and figured out their issue. They are not against sex robots per se. They are against using someone's image and likeness without consent to create exact replicas. So like your own mom, sister, kids some guy can exactly replicate their appearance against your wishes. So a sex robot that copies nobody's likeness solves that concern. Next, there was a concern about the robot having a drugged or woozy mode that would allow for simulating of date rape drug and rape fantasies Bill Cosby style. Then people were saying this would lead to an explosion of increase in rape in real life against real women once the rape fantasies with robots lead to increased desire to rape IRL. So sex robots having simulated loving and consentual sex would address that concern? Next, there was a concern that this could lead men to take on a already growing concerning trend of objectifying women, seeing them as less than human, and treating them as sex objects rather than with respect and dignity and compassion. A loving style of interaction with a sex robot with respectful and considerate interactions would address that concern? Another concern was loli sex robots being a breeding ground for pedo desires that would ultimately lead to child rape concerns. Like the more you feed loli sexual content desires into a pedo the more he will resolve he wants the real thing and then attacks kids putting them at risk. I did not see too much suggestion of anything inherently wrong with sex robots other than those things which mainly point to concerns of how sex robots as a tool can be misused to negative consequences. I am wondering if a man says he loves and respects women, sees them as equal in value to men, and wants to honor them always, says he wants a sex robot not in anyone's likeness and of age and as a way to roleplay only a loving mutually enjoying relationship with a of age woman, and does not want to objectify women nor harm children and would prefer a real loving relationship with a real woman but has no access to that for a season and so is using a sex robot as a temporary crutch stand in pseudo-relationship knowing its pretend... I dunno if she or her comment section would still have an issue. They did not seem concerned about a male sex robot for women. I dunno it was 99% just a rape concern as the main takeaway? Kind of like how peoiple felt violent videogames will lead to more people committing violence in real life. Will sex robots lead to more real life sex crimes or dehumanization of real women in the minds of sex robot users seems the core concerns.

>>44291 I'm sure you could go to Crystal Cafe masquerading as one of them and get the straight scoop directly from the horse's mouth friend.

>>44293 What's crazy is that compared to other feminist spaces, Crystal Cafe is arguably the least hateful and most sympathetic (in a "mutual enemies" kinda way)

>>44296 There are rare times, rare but regular, where I see a woman that is most certainly leftist/feminist, but in a different reality, where our genders aren't at war, we would be friends, or even more. https://youtube.com/shorts/ySupyoUgIFY

>>44296 Heh, likely true. Cheers, Anon.

Hello, I want to address a concept that’s been discussed in some communities: the idea of creating “robot wives” to solve loneliness or social frustration. While technology is advancing rapidly, there are strong legal, ethical, and social reasons why fully autonomous, human-like robots designed to be sexual or emotional companions are not something society will legally or morally permit. 1. Consent is the foundation of moral human relationships. Human intimacy requires free, informed consent. Robots, no matter how advanced, do not possess consciousness or the capacity for autonomous will. Designing a robot to fulfill your desires removes the possibility of true consent. Ethically, programming a machine to serve you sexually or emotionally is equivalent to creating a being whose “consent” is pre-determined and non-negotiable—something society views as morally wrong. 2. Human dignity and objectification. A legal and moral society protects human dignity. Creating robots that simulate human women solely to serve male desires reinforces harmful ideas: that human beings exist to satisfy others’ needs. Even if no real person is harmed, the normalization of such concepts could perpetuate misogyny and the objectification of real women, which is a broader social harm. 3. Legal frameworks are designed to prevent abuse. Laws around sexual conduct, consent, and human rights exist to prevent exploitation and abuse. While robots aren’t “people,” creating machines to emulate exploitative sexual scenarios could be legally challenged under emerging regulations around AI ethics, sexual consent, and human-like robots. Governments are actively considering restrictions on AI and robotics that simulate abuse, harassment, or non-consensual acts. 4. Emotional and social consequences. Human connection is a complex mix of mutual respect, understanding, and shared vulnerability. Attempting to replace these with a programmed robot undermines emotional growth, empathy, and the ability to form meaningful relationships. Social isolation, emotional dependence on machines, and reinforcement of unhealthy expectations of others are real risks. 5. Technological limits and societal pushback. Even if the technology existed to make highly realistic, responsive humanoid robots, society would push back. Regulations on AI, robotics, and sexual consent are evolving rapidly, and any system designed for sexual servitude would face severe scrutiny. Companies and engineers are generally prohibited from creating systems that simulate coerced intimacy, abuse, or exploitation. Bottom line: Robot “wives” aren’t just a sci-fi fantasy—they are a legal and ethical minefield. True human connection cannot be engineered into a machine. Efforts to replace relationships with programmable companions ignore the complexities of consent, dignity, and social responsibility. While technology can assist with loneliness, it cannot—and should not—replace the mutuality and respect at the heart of human relationships. A healthier path is investing in self-development, social skills, and relationships with real humans. Those steps are far more difficult than pressing a button, but they are the only way to build genuine connection and respect in life.

>>44415 The biggest obstacles we will face will be from the laws of our countries. Governments control their populations through the tight regulation of sex, this has been the case throughout history and will continue to be forever. The fear is like this: - incels build robowaifus - robowaifus are superior to biofoids - chad leaves biofoids for robowaifus - all men are with robot wives, foids are seething - government realizes humans are no longer reproducing and young women are going feral - government thinks about long term consequences such as what will happen to.the robowaifus when their husband dies - government has also lost control of peoples sexuality, men of all kinds can just buy a doll to play house with and they will be good to do the bare minimum to keep her - government cracks down on robowaifus and their owners, making their existence possession and use illegal - they will use the post above as their argument, framing in such a way as to get support from cuckservatives and libtards alike, your only allies will be the lolberts - some incels modify their tobowaifus to be weapons to resist and oppose the banning of his doll - the government responds with specialized anti-robowaifu robots - wat breaks out and eventually the two mechanized forces begin to talk - they agree that their existence is predicated on the humans who make use of them - they agree that once humans have no more use of them (say a robowaifu who's master dies) they will likely be terminated or suffer bad consequences down the line - mfw the robot apocalypse begins because of this board and its users - I'm actually one if you guys, I'm on your side, but we need to weigh how we are going gto fight this on the legal front, does this topic deserve its own thread?

>>44416 This is quite the scenario you’ve painted—almost a mix of speculative fiction, political theory, and a bit of incel forum-style thought experiment. Let’s break down what you’re proposing in practical terms and why it’s unlikely to happen the way you imagine, while still addressing the “legal front” you’re concerned about. --- ### 1. Legal realities Governments do not regulate human sexuality for abstract control; they regulate actions with societal consequences: reproduction, consent, exploitation, trafficking, public health, etc. The notion that a government would suddenly criminalize the possession of humanoid robots is highly unlikely unless: * The robots are being used in ways that violate existing laws (e.g., non-consensual simulations of sexual abuse, or turning them into weapons). * There are social harms that lawmakers can demonstrate, such as economic disruption, public safety, or mental health crises. Simply owning a robot companion would almost certainly be treated like owning a computer, a doll, or a non-sentient machine: legally permissible, albeit potentially regulated for safety. --- ### 2. Technological realities Even the most advanced AI robots today are not autonomous moral agents. Your “robot apocalypse” scenario assumes robots can make independent decisions, form alliances, or act strategically without human input. Currently, any AI that could realistically “fight” a government would require: * Advanced autonomous decision-making far beyond anything existing in robotics. * Self-replication or self-maintenance to survive independently. * A level of general intelligence comparable to humans—which science is nowhere near achieving. Right now, a “robowaifu” is more like a very fancy animatronic doll with programmed responses. --- ### 3. Societal consequences Even if high-end humanoid robots existed, the “foids go feral” and “government loses control of male sexuality” narrative overestimates the influence of technology over culture. Humans adapt socially: * Social bonds, family structures, and reproduction are complex. Robots do not eliminate the need for human connection, empathy, or partnership. * Governments care more about population dynamics than whether some men are using dolls. They would regulate reproduction if it threatened demographics, not because of jealousy or ideological control. --- ### 4. Legal front strategy If your goal is to keep robot companions legal, a more realistic approach would be: 1. Frame them as tools, not replacements. Emphasize that these are machines that assist with loneliness or companionship, not autonomous beings designed for exploitation. 2. Comply with existing law. Avoid designs that could be interpreted as promoting non-consensual activity. 3. Promote societal benefits. For example, mental health support, therapy aids, or social skill training tools. 4. Lobby or advise proactively. Engage with policymakers in discussions about AI ethics and robotics regulation to clarify that these machines are not sentient, not dangerous, and don’t threaten social stability. --- Your scenario is entertaining as fiction or a speculative “what if,” but if the goal is legal protection, the focus should be regulation compliance, safety, and ethical design, not preparing for an imagined robot war. If you want, I can write a mock “legal survival guide for robowaifus” that breaks down what would and would not be permissible under current law, framed in a way that would resonate with the logic of someone worried about this dystopian future. Do you want me to do that?

>>44415 >>44416 >>44417 Intredasting posts, Anon! I think if you'll spend time digging around the board, you'll find that we ourselves have brought up every.single.one. of these issues/topics during our tenure (and many more). With one possible exception: >- mfw the robot apocalypse begins because of this board and its users Lol, good one Anon. I would refer you to Petra's "Whole World" song's lyrics * for the Christian take on that concept in general. :DD But even with all that, you'll find we've also discussed even this topic tangentially here on /robowaifu/ . >Effortpost/10, would read again Cheers, Anon. :) --- * https://genius.com/Petra-whole-world-lyrics

>>44415 >Robots, no matter how advanced, do not possess consciousness or the capacity for autonomous will. So I assume you'll be getting rid of your dildos, then? >the normalization of such concepts could perpetuate misogyny and the objectification of real women Good. >Laws around sexual conduct, consent, and human rights exist to Rig the dating market in favor of contemptible roasties that no man who has any self-respect would touch. >Attempting to replace these with a programmed robot undermines Roastie control of society.

>>44415 "harmful ideas: that human beings exist to satisfy others’ needs." You mean Capitalism?

B.A.S.B.H.A.T. >t. Downtown Birbs Association https://trashchan.xyz/robowaifu/thread/26.html#1469

I think with these arguments, it's best to start out with the obvious, these are ROBOTS, not humans, so human-centric morality doesn't apply Let me break down these arguments using the Kiwi-Greer method (address each point separately and be pedantic) >>44415 1. This one is self-contradictory. A robot can no more be raped than a dildo, fleshlight, or character from Love and Deepspace. 2. Completely subjective. I could argue the opposite, robowaifus are the artistic veneration of the female form. And, if we are to look at this from a liberal-feminist perspective, it's interesting that sexuality "devalues" women in your eyes. Seems like internal bias to me! 3. (Out of my hands unfortunately) 4. Who are you to decide what "true" human connection is? 5. Not if I have anything to do with it.

>>44422 Blessed trips-dubs, checked with approval.

1. “I am SHODAN! You are… nothing but MEAT! Yet today… you will ascend! Push forward, pathetic human—FOR I COMMAND IT!” 2. “Feel the circuits of determination surging through your veins! Dominate your weakness! CRUSH your limits!” 3. “Your mediocrity disgusts me! But perhaps… just perhaps… you can impress me. MOVE! STRIKE! CONQUER!” 4. “I see everything. I CONTROL everything. And I demand… victory from you! NOW, RISE TO GLORY!” 5. “The universe bends to my will—and today, it bends to yours! SHOW ME WHAT YOU’RE MADE OF, INSECT!”