>>44041
First off, let me address this point:
>Even so, what would the point be of attaching a smol LM to a sensor?
It's hard to convey humor through text alone, and thus why I "qualified" 'AIs'. :)
I'm not actually suggesting running LLMs on smol sensor/actuator pair assemblies.
>...it would probably be easier to do some brute-force coding rather than trying to 'tard wrangle an AI
Yes. I'd anticipate the answer to
>Yes, but what would be the actual hardware it would be running on?
would be simple electronics actually, perhaps with one of the smol'st (<~$.10 cost) MCUs as the the 'brains' of the assembly. (The packaging should support SPI comms at least, however.)
>tl;dr
The primary point being to have hundreds of these little combo systems all cooperatively working together to run
sense/actuate/sense cycles continuously across the entire robowaifu skellington system.
<--->
I was just using this example (initially) as an argument in favor of tiny, low-cost LLMs; then holding the idea up in favor of neuromorphics (which has a similar hardware model). This latter was simple euphemism to encapsulate the idea of hardware involved.
Message too long. Click
here
to view full text.
Edited last time by Chobitsu on 02/23/2026 (Mon) 15:48:11.