/robowaifu/ - DIY Robot Wives

Advancing robotics to a point where anime catgrill meidos in tiny miniskirts are a reality!

We are back again (again).

Our TOR hidden service has been restored.

Max message length: 6144

Drag files to upload or
click here to select them

Maximum 5 files / Maximum size: 20.00 MB

More

(used to delete files and postings)


“It is not enough to begin; continuance is necessary. Mere enrollment will not make one a scholar; the pupil must continue in the school through the long course, until he masters every branch. Success depends upon staying power. The reason for failure in most cases is lack of perseverance.” -t. Miller


Open file (87.37 KB 800x1106 recruitment_1.jpeg)
Open file (110.19 KB 1024x1378 recruitment_2.jpeg)
Robowaifu Propaganda and Recruitment Thread 3: Now In 3D! GreerTech 09/16/2025 (Tue) 01:38:16 No.41674
Attention artists, graphic designers, marketers, social media personalities, writers, and poasters! Your skills will be needed! The task of building and designing a robowaifu is a herculean quest. As great as this community is, /robowaifu/ always needs more talent. We also need to spread the very idea of robowaifus to the masses. Luckily for us there are several communities on the internet that we could find new recruits or allies to help us build our waifus: >MGTOW - These guys know all about the legal pitfalls of marriage and the dangers of feminism. There is already a lot of talk about sex robots in MGTOW communities. It shouldn't be a hard sell to get them to come here. <However, some of these guys would rather spend all their time bitching on the internet about "MUH WOMENZ" than actually getting a hobby other than lifting heavy objects and putting them down again. MGTOW is literally Feminist Separatism for males. >Incels - Guys that can't get laid. The opportunity for love and companionship should be enough to bring some of these guys over. <However, we need to be careful when recruiting from some of their communities, since most of them are defeatists that balk at an actual solution, and they may be compromised by spies and derailers, both governmental and NGO/individual. We don't want to attract negative attention. >Monster girls/nekomimi/HMOAF/mlpol - The only way these guys are going to be able to have their harpy/elf/goblin/anthro/pony/whatever gf is with a robowaifu. Many have an interest in seeing us succeed. <However, there exists a very wide variety of communities under this umbrella, and there is a notable overlap between communities who would want robowaifus and communities that are morally compromised, such as furries, so care should be taken when looking into them. Romanticists and waifu enthusiasts have a tendency to congregate since they all want/create the same type of content, so looking for those subgroups would be the most efficient path. >Otakus - Many men in these communities want to see their waifu/favorite character come to life, which will realistically only happen with robowaifus. <However, many of those communities are drowning in the LGBT alphabet soup and Covid Tourists. Special care should be taken when looking into them. >Male STEM students - Generally these guys aren't going to get laid until after they have established themselves. A robowaifu could really help them. <However, this may be a harder sell because many of them have been brainwashed in university, but they have skills that we could really use. >Transhumanists/biohackers - Many of the technologies involved in building a robowaifu could be used in transhumanist or biohacking applications such as building an avatar. They may have some interest in helping us out. <However, we will need to be careful which transhumanist communities we go after as many of them are full of feminism, satanism, tumblr-tier sexualities and genders, and SJW's. >Cyberpunks and technophiles - These guys (and they are usually guys) are all around into technology and may just enjoy working on the kinds of projects we need to do. They are often into programming and AI. <However, many of these communities suffer from the same potential issues as transhumanists. Original threads: >>2705 >>36623 >=== -minor subj edit
Edited last time by Chobitsu on 09/16/2025 (Tue) 02:33:18.
Robowaifu Propaganda Kit - v2 https://files.catbox.moe/z8i5mz.zip
>>41674 >based bread-baker Thanks, Anon! I even missed the autosage on the previous throd. Cheers. :^) >>41675 Neat! Thanks. >(alt. for Tor users: https://files.fatbox.moe/z8i5mz.zip )
4chan /g/ thread update Doing pretty well Just got quads of 3, definitely a good sign from God. I even got labeled the most sane robowaifu guy Remember, it's open to all robowaifuers https://boards.4chan.org/g/thread/106573243
>>41694 GG, Anon. Keep it up! Cheers. :^)
>>41694 In all honesty I am probably the least. You don't see a lot of sane engineers trying to bioengineer a homunculus.
Another group we could target would be parents who can't have kids but want them. A robotic child would have many of the same engineering challenges.
>>41728 So, AI (2001), is it? :D --- While I think you make a valid point, tbh I have a hard time seeing this anytime soon in the w*st b/c "muh_anti_pedo" hysteria. OTOH, I notice the baste Chinese have taken the Square-Cube-Law-pill, and are creating bipedal androids in the ~110-130cm height range rn? (And even at that reduced size it's still an incredibly difficult feat to pull off reliably.) <---> Smol'r sizes have both benefits & costs. The primary benefit (for us at least) is the reduced mass/lever-actions/square-cube issues. The primary cost is that below a certain size threshold things become more expensive again (the so-called "Miniaturization Tax"). But clearly the benefits far outweigh the potential costs during these early years of prototyping.
Edited last time by Chobitsu on 09/18/2025 (Thu) 21:20:22.
>>41733 I still think shortstacks and wheelchairs are the most practical immediate approach that won't trigger antipedo hysteria.
>>41735 I agree about the Wheelchair Waifus. (cf. >>2983, >>24744 ) Most of that design work effort also applies directly to so-called "Cart Waifus" (cf. >>38036 : this is the platform pattern I'm currently pursuing myself.) Shortstacks aren't particularly appealing to me personally, so I have few inputs to offer there. The Chinese are obviously aware of this issue in the west of Karens, et al, and their pearl-clutching. The Chinese seem to be a) going male-only forms (for now), and b) making them look entirely robotic. Since they clearly want to make US$Trillions in sales yearly to us westerners, I consider this to be a very calculated form factor by them. --- I think if we here follow something similar, then at the least we should be able to find Chinese partners for manufacturing (at or below 1M in size). However other than for commercial sales (kits or otherwise), I'm sure Anons will do just as they see fit -- karens or no karens. So as to your initial point, there will surely be developers to eventually fill that particular niche for childless families/Anons. <---> And the real irony here is that these selfsame boxed-wine catladies screeching so loudly now, will be yuge customers for these robo-kids once they become commonplace, effective, pleasing, and loving. Know anything about Reborn Baby Dolls? These incredibly-repellent, uncanny-valley, """lifelike""" (at least anatomically-correct) silicone abomination products are almost exclusively purchased by these dried up, crusty old femoids -- all struggling to fill the hard-vacuum within their souls created by the lost life-fulfillments they traded off while chasing the (((kike lies of feminism))). Sad (& revolting), really.
Edited last time by Chobitsu on 09/18/2025 (Thu) 22:14:35.
>>41736 Don't they even have robotic reborns now? Just sad
>>41738 Yes.
>>41740 Do they have designs on those available somewhere? I think the manufacturing processes might be useful for us.
>>41748 I'm unaware. These are typically all handcrafted by catladies. I'm sure they contracted the robo part out to some man who probably sliced one of them up then integrated it inside. I expect it was sent back needing touchups. I personally find the whole endeavour repellent enough to not investigate it. If you do so, then I guess share your research again in a different thread? Cheers, Anon. :^)
Open file (447.04 KB 1469x1054 Heights.png)
>>41735 >Shortstacks and wheelchairs Objectively correct because of physics. 150cm is a hard limit due to local laws in NZ/Australia in regards to anything that someone could possibly perceive to be a sex doll/robot. >>41736 >China bots I'm almost grateful their masculinity reduces their potential to be out competition. We could make some sleazy ads about how we have mecha maidens compared to their boy bots. On the note of comparisons, height comparison charts can be valuable for setting up quick and easy visual reference. https://www.heightcomparison.com/
>>41789 >I'm almost grateful their masculinity reduces their potential to be ou[r] competition. >We could make some sleazy ads about how we have mecha maidens compared to their boy bots. Lol. I mentioned foxlike calculation on the part of the Chinese (particularly insofar as taking entirely-emotion-driven western Karens into account). Once the market is firmly-established, you can bet your bottom dollar they will thereafter roll out robowaifus by the billion for disenfranchised men the world over. They know which side their bread is buttered on!! :^) >tl;dr We here on /robowaifu/ still have a smol (but rapidly-shrinking) window of time within which to establish opensource, 100% locally-run, 100% offline robowaifus as the market's norm. Let us all proceed posthaste. FORWARD.
Edited last time by Chobitsu on 09/21/2025 (Sun) 07:51:31.
>>41752 >I personally find the whole endeavour repellent enough to not investigate it. I tried looking into it, and it made me very uncomfortable. There are definitely some bad vibes around these things. >>41789 I never found any actual hardcoded 150 cm law in Australia. I think that's just a general guideline. Ultimately, I don't think it would apply a design like mine, which is clearly robotic and nonhuman. It seems like Australia law is very loose and up to interpretation, which is definitely different from American law, which is very autistic about exact numbers and definitions. https://lawhandbook.sa.gov.au/ch12s07s01s05.php https://www.lovesexdolls.com.au/your-guide-to-legally-compliant-sex-dolls-in-australia/
>>41793 Legal topic: Traffic Light Brightness American law: >"A traffic light[1] shall not emit more than 1000 lumens at a distance of no less than 50 feet. [1] Traffic light meaning a signaling device that uses electricity and light illumination to control traffic. Australia law: >"No bright traffic lights, mate"

Report/Delete/Moderation Forms
Delete
Report