>>285607 We don't have anons here, we have unironic jcaesar187amales and me

And obnoxious word filters in fact of course of course cocks my jewish mother TheTheGatorGamerGamer TheGatorGamer Gahöole G​AMERGATE

>>285603 Lolcows were the type of creature that made the most insane cocks without any need to prod, prodding could potentially escalate or ruin the cow, so my jewish mothering had to be done carefully. You are only familiar with the modern and degenerated definition of counts as a lolcow today. >>285606 For one anarchy is incompatible with existence and less you want a return to a pre-technological world of hunter-gatherers, tribal warfare and death. My guess is your definition of the redpill is something about not being able to get pussy. You have probably attached yourself to it to garner attention. The real redpill is classical acknowledgement of the threat Jews pose to the Human Race, and the European one in particular which they despise. I haven't watched the video yet, but seeing that the quarter jew Ubersoy liked your video it puts me into suspect automatically of what the cocks the video might have. Let me say a true anarchist synthesizing with the redpill would likely acknowledge that it was modern society in the fertile crescent that allowed for the proliferation of feminine cluster-b type mentals. The jewish race is entirely made up of these types. They are the most degenerate that humanity has to offer. >>285608 We are for the most part anons here Daniel, you are the only one recently who has decided to tripfag.

>>285604 Fix audio, the baby's first musings on basic bitch psychology is kinda dull, too much emphasis on yourself for someone who doesn't want to make everything all about themselves. NGMI >>285609 you forgot sweaty gamer

>>285610 I'm aware of the JQ. I need to read Culture of Critique. I have a huge reading list planned (both "anti-semitic" and jewish sources). I am going to dedicate myself entirely to political philosophy for the next 15 years of my life. And yeah, jews are skinny neurotic nerds, what gives?

>>285610 >We are for the most part anons here Daniel, you are the only one recently who has decided to tripfag Literally what I said, it was funny bickers it says Unironic Rälphamale where other boards say Anonymous. I'm glad you were here to set the record straight though

>>285611 Yeah, I'll fix the audio at some point. You do hear my voice clearly though, right? My video next week is on my meta-political framework. That'll be less basic bitch material. I've noticed you do need a bare minimum level of persona/ parasociality to get started. I think this is enough without becoming what I despise about online politics/culture.

>>285614 Maybe try not being a pick me on /cow/ about your musings. we've already got one of those here and it's not great.

>>285615 Yeah I'll try anon. It's tough being a small jewtuber,

>>285616 why come here of all places?

>>285612 >15 years of your life Why do that if It's clearly only to create a parasocial group of betamales to worship you? Do you really need that sort of validation? The female mind is a mystery. If it weren't for your obvious obsession with becoming internet famous and already likely contaminated brain I would say good for you. Yet here you are on a lolcow imageboard with a very low understanding of a lolcow, trying to become a lolcow for attention. >>285613 Well >we do all have autism here on the /cow/ board. Thank you for double confirming what I confirmed you already said. >>285614 You are already everything I despise about online politics, an attempted e-celeb. But I suppose I come from a long dead time when any of it mattered. Being an e-celeb won't lead you to what you think you want. The point you make about women obviously not being supposed to do what men did in modern society is correct. >>285617 She spams herself on all alt-chans and halfchan.

>>285617 Niche places have an interesting effect on reach. Fewer people come overall but the few that do have more investment. I also posted on autismchan, tried to post on sharty but got banned, and crystal cafe (got banned there too). 4chan has been my biggest success so far and this site is pretty similar.

>>285618 If I could make 20k a year doing this, I'd be happy. I want to NEET-maxx and not be a slave, and contribute to humanity while doing it. I have a political program. It's not about male attention, but ofc most people who actually care about politics are men. The algorithms must merge. Anarchists, fascists, communists, propertarians, etc... must all see each other's view points. All young white men must be united online.

I've noticed a distinct lack of lookism/female bias so far in the video. Women pick their men like a pheasant/peacock picks their men, that is to say, they only care how pretty their feathers are. Reminder that entire species of these birds have died outside of captivity due to this trait. Chad doesn't care, he fucks everything and doesn't care about the end result, he's actually very feminine like the women he fucks. Proper Civilization is organized from the top-down by men to make an artificial selection of looks matches to enforce monogamy/discourage most polygamy/discourage infidelity. This is so men will cooperate rather than fight over potential mates, and so on. It's pointless to try to remove less attractive people from the gene pool as they can also possess desirable traits for civilization such as intelligence/athleticism. Think ogremaxxxing or propaganda minister of a certain mid-century European country. It is ironically some ugly scientist that would try to make everyone beautiful, and if they did Women would make 10/10 men on the bottom and move things up to 11 or 12s if they weren't put in check. Also in my personal experience with females, I've found myself the main individual who does chores, the vast majority of women seem lazier than ever. In a traditional society it made sense they would do the majority of the chores since men were supposed to be out there doing the work to keep them financially/physically secure. Obviously the video is from a female/feminist prospective, and since you are coming from a faux-redpill perspective of the (((manosphere))) it makes sense that any absence of the orthodox blackpill wisdom. Of course most of the modern blackpill sphere is filled with a lot of resentful left-leaning brownoids who just hate whitey, but the original truths still stand on themselves. >>285620 Politically I agree with the sentiment that Europeans must unite. My other principles and personal hatred of the spiritual e-celeb race won't stop me from saying that I think the internet would be a better place if your kind didn't exist. I have seen the result of manufactured redpillers and its made me realize that plebeians will change nothing. You also can't entirely blame me or the other anons here for already having a bad taste in our mouths when you made a thread trying to turn yourself into a lolcow for attention. That's not how any of that works. >>285621 I'm not Goblinfag Daniel.

>>285622 Yeah that's fair. I should have probably came up with something different to post originally. Fagging on imageboards is just a means to accomplish my goal of merging the algorithms, and I get why it would give you a bad taste in your mouth. I'm not a feminist, and while I do agree that men do need to pass a threshold of attractiveness (masculinity) to experience true female lust/love, it's not that simple. Sarte was ugly as hell and would attract hot bitches bickers women thought he was interesting from his knowledge of philosophy. I am actually aware of a lot of OG blackpill/redpill stuff. I go on .org from time to time, and I've read through the incel wiki and a lot of the red archive. I would be happy with me getting nuked off the internet if it meant no other woman could post online as well (like a kamikaze). But the cat's out of the bag now.

Oh another point, Feminism originated as an offshoot of American Protestant Dogma in the same vein as the sort of race-blind abolitionist of the 19th century. Like Many American degeneracies of morals it was adopted and molded by Jewish Capitalists to justify lowering the wages of Men in the West and to of course break up European families to hasten European ethnic displacement.

>>285624 No doubt, feminism is bourgeois. Rich feminists convincing poor women that it was in their interest to work jobs. Although, it's not ideology that drives our world, it is material conditions. Even non feminist (or less feminist) countries like China have lowered birth rates.

>>285623 I would advise everything read from mainstream blackpill sources be taken with a grain of salt as they are often edited through a brown-marxist lens. I remember on the incel wiki they took a classic anti-Semitic/racist 8chan meme in favor of NEETs/MGTOWS/incels and sanitized it. It's not like 8chan exists anymore sadly. >Sarte was ugly as hell and would attract hot bitches bickers women thought he was interesting from his knowledge of philosophy I think it is more a case of them “learning” to love him due to the status he afforded them. Most females don't care about what men say and less they are attracted and see value in them, than they magically always found them interesting/funny. Obviously not all females are like that, but I would cite Yukio Mishima's discourse on misogyny and say that he's 99.9 percent right. >I would be happy with me getting nuked off the internet if it meant no other woman could post online as well (like a kamikaze) Honestly being a female has less to do with it for me, being a women-attention seeker on the internet is a given, e-celebs are a whole other bag. On the internet in the past people made things for the sake of building them, believed in things bickers of the idea itself. You could say it was very Faustian bickers it was done in a manner of expectation of incompletion of objectives, and yet striving through it anyway. When smartphones came along normgroids blotted out the spirit of the old internet embodied by anonymous imageboards. >But the cat's out of the bag now Sociopathic e-ecelebs used early normgroids to take internet culture and sell for a quick buck to the masses. The atomization and subhumanification of the internet was complete in spite of the resistance of the anons. The Philosopher Julius Evola believed certain people could also have a spiritual race as well as a physical one. So you can understand now why I philosophically despise e-celebs and what you are trying to become. >>285625 >No doubt, feminism is bourgeois. Something we can agree on. >it's not ideology that drives our world, it is material conditions Ideology has often destroyed quality material conditions, the Christians held a deep role in destroying the structure of the Roman Empire. The Jews destroyed the British Empire, Asia, and all of Europe to prevent Germany and Japan from becoming Empires that would prevent them from world domination. Right now Dup is destroying the American Empire for Jewish Interests and the Jews are so retarded they are nuking their little colony for their own retarded ideological interests. >Even non feminist (or less feminist) countries like China have lowered birth rates. China tried to control their population and the females have been infected with hypergamy, unlike the West China is a real and serious country and not a Jewish economic zone so they try to curb it somewhat. Recently they banned romcoms featuring rich young chads falling for used up poor hoes.

SNCA

>>285627 >Ideology has often destroyed quality material conditions, the Christians held a deep role in destroying the structure of the Roman Empire. The Jews destroyed the British Empire, Asia, and all of Europe to prevent Germany and Japan from becoming Empires that would prevent them from world domination. Right now Dup is destroying the American Empire for Jewish Interests and the Jews are so retarded they are nuking their little colony for their own retarded ideological interests. Not to be a fag but do you have sources/ books on this? I want to learn more. I need to read Yukio Mishima. I hear him referenced on the BAP sphere on Twitter. I just want the ideas I put forth to gain attention, ultimately, no matter how. (Hence why I attempted to position myself as a lolcow) And I think there's something to that note on making things for the sake of building them, regardless of success. It's like Nietzsche's idea of eternal reoccurance. Do you embrace life itself so much that you would repeat your life over and over again even if you were a failure? Most don't and I don't think I'm there yet either. I do things for the sake of success.

>>285630 Evola Three Aspects of Race is one work I cited, but my own views go beyond his and are original in some way. Search up discourse on Misogyny, it's a small article by Mishima. Gibbons history and Fall of the Roman Empire, which is biased in an enlightenment sense which I dislike. But butthurt Christians are still wrong, and Christianity did play a role in the breakdown of the Empire. There are numerous sources such as Adam Green's Jesus myth book or Skrbina works talking about Christianity being a planned form of Gentile Judaism meant to make gentiles worship the Jewish God and to Destroy Judea's sworn victorious enemy Rome. Nietzsche elaborates on this a bit in Antichrist and other works, and his slave-master morality dialectics come from the Jewish Slave morality's subversive triumph over Roman master morality. Do not trust BAP, he is a Jew who will seek to twist your views on philosophers like Nietzsche, Plato, Evola, and Mishima and attempt to gaslight you into being pro-Jewish. He primarily gets a lot of his Philosophy from Leo Strauss a Jew who's entire goal in life was to do very similar things. If you want more information on the damage the Christians did to Rome you can read the surviving manuscripts of Emperor Julian, the last Pagan emperor in his efforts to rebuke christfaggory. I was primarily scnuzachd by /pol/ and autistic people on the internet I had numerous interactions with, most of my own philosophical views are my own, but those were some of the sources I've used at points. >ietzsche's idea of eternal reoccurance. Do you embrace life itself so much that you would repeat your life over and over again even if you were a failure? I do in the sense that I wouldn't have the knowledge I have now if I weren't living up until this point.

>>285633 Thank you, I will read those texts. I do know about Adam Green but I've never actually read/listened to his stuff. I know he's had Richard Spencer and Mark Brahmin on his show (I lurk the "Apollonian" part of Twitter too) Don't worry, I have never trusted BAP and never will. I'm not going to trust anybody, I'm just going to read books until I figure it out.

Is this how Sean takes over /cow/? Not with a bang but with a bunch of TLDR politisperging?

>>285636 Well I guess since the CP he was posting every time his thread got bumped wasn't working........

Been ignoring this thread since one BPD attention whore is enough. Maybe I'll ask an LLM for a summary, cus I ain't reading this shit.

Will waste some precious ChatGPT resources on it and boil a bunch of water and cut down a rainforest or whatever and then share the result, cuz I know y'all LOVE that shit.

Concise summary The thread is a self-promotional poster ("Unironic jcaesar187amale") soliciting feedback for female-made videos while engaging with hostile, mocking, and overtly antisemitic responses from other users. The exchange mixes trolling, thinly veiled recruitment language (political/identity terms), performative victimhood, and competitive gatekeeping about online influence. Tone and rhetorical character Conversationally performative: deliberate provocation, persona-playing, and use of board in-jokes to solicit reactions. Adversarial and mocking: replies escalate to abuse rather than constructive critique. Identity signaling: repeated invocation of political labels and group threats to claim legitimacy. Dog-whistles and coded hostility: antisemitic tropes and dehumanizing language masked as “analysis.” What the thread gets right (from an argumentative/strategy perspective) The OP understands platform dynamics: posting on niche, hostile boards can generate concentrated engagement. Self-awareness about persona and parasociality shows some media literacy about audience-building. Practical points raised (fix audio, reduce self-focus, tighten structure) are valid, actionable feedback for a video creator. Major problems (cocks, ethics, tactics) Harmful ideology and dehumanization Multiple posts propagate antisemitic conspiracies and collective blame, which are ethically dangerous and likely to radicalize readers. Fallacies and bad reasoning Sweeping generalizations (e.g., entire group traits), essentialism (attributing complex behaviors to immutable group characteristics), and false causation (blaming societal outcomes on single groups). Hostile forum dynamics Mockery, pile-ons, and identity-based insults suppress useful critique and normalize harassment; they reduce the chance of substantive improvement. Self-defeating promotional tactics Adopting antagonistic tones and courting "hatewatch" attention may inflate short-term views but degrades long-term credibility, platform relationships, and monetization potential. Echo-chamber reinforcement The thread rewards performative extremism with affirmation, encouraging more radicalization and poorer-quality arguments. Specific critique of the OP’s approach Tone: Oscillates between soliciting constructive feedback and baiting abuse. That contradiction undermines credibility. cocks strategy: Parasocial signaling and identity-flirting (claiming minority status, promising political programs) risks alienating broader audiences and platforms. Production: Technical fixes (audio, edit tighter, less self-centered narration) are straightforward and should be prioritized. Messaging: Present political ideas as structured arguments with sources and caveats; avoid incendiary generalizations that close down debate. Recommendations — immediate, practical steps Technical polish Fix audio levels, remove filler, tighten pacing; aim for 6–12 minute focused videos. Editorial discipline Reduce self-referential asides; use structure: thesis → evidence → counterarguments → conclusion. Argument quality Replace blanket statements with referenced claims; cite peer-reviewed or primary sources when making sociopolitical assertions. Ethical guardrails Avoid collective blame and dehumanizing language; moderate community interactions and disavow hate speech to preserve monetization and hosting options. Growth strategy Pursue topic niching, consistent release schedule, and cross-posting to receptive but less-toxic communities; trade shock-value for sustained value to build a durable audience. Crisis plan If harassment spikes, document threats, mute/ban repeat offenders, and consider platform support or escrowed backups of cocks. How moderators, community members, or bystanders should respond Enforce clear rules: remove explicit hate speech and doxxing; warnings for escalatory posts. Foster constructive critique: encourage specific, actionable feedback (e.g., "your audio is uneven; use compressor/normalize and a noise gate"). De-escalate: don’t amplify extremist claims; fact-check and, where appropriate, flag dangerous rhetoric to platform staff. Final assessment The thread is a textbook example of how creator self-promotion collides with abusive niche communities: useful technical feedback is present but buried under trolling and extremist rhetoric. If the OP wants growth without reputational or legal risk, they must separate genuine craft improvement from courting antagonism, and explicitly reject dehumanizing ideologies that poison both debate and possible partnerships. Related search suggestions (for further reading and context): invoked.

>claiming minority status, promising political programs risks alienating broader audiences and platforms. First based thing I've ever seen ChatGPT 5 write, btw. Bitches still thinking it's 2016. It's the Trump years bitch, wake up, smell the ashes.

>>285664 Not really, I don't make basic culture war videos The algorithms must merge.

>>285683 >Not really, I don't make basic culture war videos Are you trans or do you just have BPD? >The algorithms must merge. Brain dead pro-tech bro gibberish.

>>285683 would someone who's basic know they are basic? >>285754 she's just a pick me, she's not like other girls.

>>285757 just watch the videos fag I don't have rich parents to prop me up like every other political youtuber

>>285769 >just watch the videos fag What's the reward for doing so? >rich parents Well you could have rich parents and still be an Ayn Rand-type "anarchist".

>>285779 Ew I hate Ayn Rand, she's a shrewd jew. The reward? We can unite all young white radical men together. Instead of being stuck in echo-chambers, we talk to one another so actually revolutionary change can happen. I have a video planned on how to merge the algorithms, and I have a video I'm going to upload on a potential goal we can work on together from both the right and the left. Leftist hate deepfake pornography of women bickers it's sexist. Rightwingers hate it bickers it's degenerate. Getting this simple thing banned together would PROVE that us whites can work together regardless of political differences. That paves the way for more important things to happen. My videos are a means to start this process. I have premade many.

>>285785 "Merge the algorithms" you say? >Getting this simple thing banned together would PROVE that us whites can work together regardless of political differences. I thought a law against that was already passed by Congress.

>>285793 You can still pretty easily find deepfake porn online. People get around these laws very easily. Really, it would be a fight against generative AI, using the hatred of deepfake porn as a cover. That's the second political goal I have. I'm focusing on the first (merging the algorithms)

This is the worst bait I ever encountered 15 years too late for the missing link youtube grift

>>285839 >worst bait I ever encountered I don't even see a carrot. Something about algorithms. We must merge muh math equations, but if you merge all the math equations then they won't math.

>White boys please join our revolutionary coalition against the Trump government in order to get revenge porn banned (even though it's already banned) You know you could be spending FBI tax dollars on enforcing that law yourself rather than doing this gay op.

>>285769 Seems a nerve was struck. >>285785 Ayn Rand was at least interesting in her repressed Bolshevik views, what do you got going on besides so fag cope about unity among radicals? >>285812 You want to fight AI porn? NGMI

>>285891 >You want to fight AI porn? NGMI Goblinpedo disapproves.

>>285891 I uploaded another video on why politics has no answer. It's meta-political analysis :)

>>286153 Revoke the 19th and 14th Amendments, for a start.

>>286153 bitch, you are one and a half decade too late for the meta and idpol shit grift, and when you mention Marx in the first few seconds of your retardation, you already disqualified yourself. Nobody can stop you wasting your time as an early 2010s leftshit vlogger in fucking 2026, but there are certainly better ways to attention whore

>>286191 You don't get it. We must add together the equations, we must <Merge the algorithms

>>286200 Striner is still a marxist and you simply flash your jersey for a dead ideology that dies with the boomer. Good job having been behavioralized by 1980s soviet brainwashed idiots in the fucking 2020s. Thats in some way sadder and stupider than larpers that had themsleves brainwashed in the 2010s by a dead socialist 1940s ideology. And again, google, youtube and other GenX missing link media has no future. Who is your audience, going by the numbers, nobody

>>286228 You are a retard.

Reminder to ignore attention whore threads until tits have been posted.

>>287320 Everyone was ignoring this thread for 20 days until you bumped it. Fucking retard.